1
Jesus and the Adulteress - THE TRAP on Wed 27 Jun 2007, 10:11 pm
The Gospel of John records an incident where teachers of the law and Parisees tried to trap Jesus. The points to be noticed in this incident are:
First
John says, they tried to trap Jesus. Now the question is what was their scheme and how they would achieve their plan?
Second
What was the Mosiac Law about adultery?
Third
Was that woman really caught in the act of adultery?
Fourth
Why did Jesus not condemn the woman?
To answer these questions or points, we need to look into the scripture and study it very closely keeping in mind the context "TRAP" and the time, that is the Roman Government's Rule.
And the scribes and the Pharisees brought to Him a woman having been taken in adultery. And standing her in the middle, they said to Him, Teacher, this woman was taken in the very act, committing adultery. And in the Law, Moses commanded that such should be stoned . You, then, what do You say? But they said this, tempting Him, that they may have reason to accuse Him. But bending down, Jesus wrote with the finger in the earth, not appearing to hear. But as they continued questioning Him, bending back up, He said to them, The one among you without sin, let him cast the first stone at her. And bending down again, He wrote in the earth. But hearing, and being convicted by the conscience, they went out one by one, beginning from the older ones, until the last. And Jesus was left alone, and the woman standing in the middle. And Jesus bending back up, and having seen no one but the woman, He said to her, Woman, where are those, the accusers of you? Did not one give judgment against you? And she said, No one, Lord. And Jesus said to her, Neither do I judge you. Go, and sin no more. [John 8:3-11]
The text clearly states the motives of the teachers of the law and Pharisees, who brought the woman to Jesus. They did it to trap Jesus [verse 6]and have something to accuse Him of. Their motives were hypocritical. They did not care about the woman or the law.
Mosiac law says:
"And a man who committeth adultery with a man's wife--who committeth adultery with the wife of his neighbour--the adulterer and the adulteress are surely put to death." [Leviticus 20:10]
"If a man be found lying with a woman married to a husband, then they shall both of them die, the man that lay with the woman, and the woman: so shalt thou put away the evil from Israel." [Deuteronomy 22:22]
The teaching of the law, found in Leviticus. 20:10; Deuteronomy 22:22 teaches that both the adulterer and the adulteress should be put to death. If the woman was taken in the very act, then the man should have been caught too. Where was he? If the Jews were really so concerned about following Moses' law as they pretended to be, they would have brought the man too. What they really wanted to do was to trap Jesus.
THE TRAP
As Jesus claimed to be the King of Jews, and if He judged that woman according to Moses Law, then, Jesus would have surely threatened the writ/authority of the Roman Government and they would have easily accused Jesus of rebellion against the Roman Government. It was the Roman government who could sentence anyone to death. (John 18:31) If he said not to kill her then they could accuse Him of breaking Moses' law.
They continued to press Jesus for an answer, so He said that whoever among them was sinless should be the first to throw a stone at her. This turned the tables on them in more than one way.
First
It gave them the duty to kill her, if it was to be done. This approach agreed with the Law of Moses, which they claimed to be following, for it said the witnesses must be the first ones to initiate the execution of the guilty "At the mouth of two witnesses, or three witnesses, shall he that is to die be put to death; at the mouth of one witness he shall not be put to death. The hand of the witnesses shall be first upon him to put him to death, and afterward the hand of all the people. So thou shalt put away the evil from the midst of thee."[Deut. 17:6,7] They would have to execute her if it was to be done. In that case, they would be the ones to have to give an answer to the Romans for challenging the writ of the Government.
Second
This was an appeal to their own consciences. In the presence of all the people, Jesus was forcing them to claim, if they stoned her, that they themselves were innocent of guilt. They had come to Jesus with hypocritical intentions, not to uphold the law, but to trap Him. His approach called attention to the evil they were committing in the very act of bringing the woman to Jesus.
Third
After Jesus' statement, the accusers left. When Jesus then said that He did not "condemn" the woman in v11, He uses the word "condemn" as in v10 - to pass a death sentence and determine to stone her to death. Jesus was saying that her accusers had not been willing to do that, so neither would Jesus condemn her to be stoned. According to the law, her accusers had to be the ones to cast the first stone. The law required a person to be put to death only if there were two or more witnesses to condemn them. They could not be condemned when there were no witnesses nor even if there was just one witness [Deut. 19:15; 17:6]. When the accusers left, Jesus could not stone her according to the law. But Jesus did tell her not to sin any more.
Now let us put this whole incident of John 8:3-11 in relevance to Psalm 7:14-17
"He who is pregnant with evil and conceives trouble, gives birth to disillusionment. He who digs a hole and scoop it out, falls into the pit he has made. The trouble he causes recoils hinself, his violence comes down on his own head"
First
John says, they tried to trap Jesus. Now the question is what was their scheme and how they would achieve their plan?
Second
What was the Mosiac Law about adultery?
Third
Was that woman really caught in the act of adultery?
Fourth
Why did Jesus not condemn the woman?
To answer these questions or points, we need to look into the scripture and study it very closely keeping in mind the context "TRAP" and the time, that is the Roman Government's Rule.
And the scribes and the Pharisees brought to Him a woman having been taken in adultery. And standing her in the middle, they said to Him, Teacher, this woman was taken in the very act, committing adultery. And in the Law, Moses commanded that such should be stoned . You, then, what do You say? But they said this, tempting Him, that they may have reason to accuse Him. But bending down, Jesus wrote with the finger in the earth, not appearing to hear. But as they continued questioning Him, bending back up, He said to them, The one among you without sin, let him cast the first stone at her. And bending down again, He wrote in the earth. But hearing, and being convicted by the conscience, they went out one by one, beginning from the older ones, until the last. And Jesus was left alone, and the woman standing in the middle. And Jesus bending back up, and having seen no one but the woman, He said to her, Woman, where are those, the accusers of you? Did not one give judgment against you? And she said, No one, Lord. And Jesus said to her, Neither do I judge you. Go, and sin no more. [John 8:3-11]
The text clearly states the motives of the teachers of the law and Pharisees, who brought the woman to Jesus. They did it to trap Jesus [verse 6]and have something to accuse Him of. Their motives were hypocritical. They did not care about the woman or the law.
Mosiac law says:
"And a man who committeth adultery with a man's wife--who committeth adultery with the wife of his neighbour--the adulterer and the adulteress are surely put to death." [Leviticus 20:10]
"If a man be found lying with a woman married to a husband, then they shall both of them die, the man that lay with the woman, and the woman: so shalt thou put away the evil from Israel." [Deuteronomy 22:22]
The teaching of the law, found in Leviticus. 20:10; Deuteronomy 22:22 teaches that both the adulterer and the adulteress should be put to death. If the woman was taken in the very act, then the man should have been caught too. Where was he? If the Jews were really so concerned about following Moses' law as they pretended to be, they would have brought the man too. What they really wanted to do was to trap Jesus.
THE TRAP
As Jesus claimed to be the King of Jews, and if He judged that woman according to Moses Law, then, Jesus would have surely threatened the writ/authority of the Roman Government and they would have easily accused Jesus of rebellion against the Roman Government. It was the Roman government who could sentence anyone to death. (John 18:31) If he said not to kill her then they could accuse Him of breaking Moses' law.
They continued to press Jesus for an answer, so He said that whoever among them was sinless should be the first to throw a stone at her. This turned the tables on them in more than one way.
First
It gave them the duty to kill her, if it was to be done. This approach agreed with the Law of Moses, which they claimed to be following, for it said the witnesses must be the first ones to initiate the execution of the guilty "At the mouth of two witnesses, or three witnesses, shall he that is to die be put to death; at the mouth of one witness he shall not be put to death. The hand of the witnesses shall be first upon him to put him to death, and afterward the hand of all the people. So thou shalt put away the evil from the midst of thee."[Deut. 17:6,7] They would have to execute her if it was to be done. In that case, they would be the ones to have to give an answer to the Romans for challenging the writ of the Government.
Second
This was an appeal to their own consciences. In the presence of all the people, Jesus was forcing them to claim, if they stoned her, that they themselves were innocent of guilt. They had come to Jesus with hypocritical intentions, not to uphold the law, but to trap Him. His approach called attention to the evil they were committing in the very act of bringing the woman to Jesus.
Third
After Jesus' statement, the accusers left. When Jesus then said that He did not "condemn" the woman in v11, He uses the word "condemn" as in v10 - to pass a death sentence and determine to stone her to death. Jesus was saying that her accusers had not been willing to do that, so neither would Jesus condemn her to be stoned. According to the law, her accusers had to be the ones to cast the first stone. The law required a person to be put to death only if there were two or more witnesses to condemn them. They could not be condemned when there were no witnesses nor even if there was just one witness [Deut. 19:15; 17:6]. When the accusers left, Jesus could not stone her according to the law. But Jesus did tell her not to sin any more.
Now let us put this whole incident of John 8:3-11 in relevance to Psalm 7:14-17
"He who is pregnant with evil and conceives trouble, gives birth to disillusionment. He who digs a hole and scoop it out, falls into the pit he has made. The trouble he causes recoils hinself, his violence comes down on his own head"
Last edited by Waqar Daniel on Wed 16 Jul 2008, 10:37 pm; edited 1 time in total
_________________


Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the LORD Jesus Christ. (Philemon 1:3)
















